![]() |
Can Construction Grammar Be Proven Wrong - Printable Version +- Softwarez.Info - Software's World! (https://softwarez.info) +-- Forum: Library Zone (https://softwarez.info/Forum-Library-Zone) +--- Forum: E-Books (https://softwarez.info/Forum-E-Books) +--- Thread: Can Construction Grammar Be Proven Wrong (/Thread-Can-Construction-Grammar-Be-Proven-Wrong) |
Can Construction Grammar Be Proven Wrong - ebooks1001 - 01-14-2024 ![]() Free Download Can Construction Grammar Be Proven Wrong? English | 2024 | ISBN: 1009478788 | 82 Pages | PDF (True) | 2 MB Construction Grammar has gained prominence in linguistics, owing its popularity to its inclusive approach that considers language units of varying sizes and generality as potential constructions - mentally stored form-function units. This Element serves as a cautionary note against complacency and dogmatism. It emphasizes the enduring importance of falsifiability as a criterion for scientific hypotheses and theories. Can every postulated construction, in principle, be empirically demonstrated not to exist? As a case study, the author examines the schematic English transitive verb-particle construction, which defies experimental verification. He argues that we can still reject its non-existence using sound linguistic reasoning. But beyond individual constructions, what could be a crucial test for Construction Grammar itself, one that would falsify it as a theory? In making a proposal for such a test, designed to prove that speakers also exhibit pure-form knowledge, this Element contributes to ongoing discussions about Construction Grammar's theoretical foundations. Recommend Download Link Hight Speed | Please Say Thanks Keep Topic Live Links are Interchangeable - Single Extraction |